Indian Vanguard

  • April-May-June 2011

    Peoples March 2011- April May June 01 copy
  • Who is the problem, the CPI (Maoist) or the Indian State?

  • Democracy’ at its worst !

  • Narayanpatna: Fact Finding Report

  • Interview: Aruna Roy

    The State wiil fail if the army and air force are used against the maoists

    Interview with Aruna Roy

  • The Heart of India is Under attack- Arundhati Roy

    Arundhati roy 22

  • Peoples March, Novemeber

    Pm Nove 2009 Issue 1101 copy

  • Debates on Lalgarh

    Debates on Lalgarh copy

  • Interview: Koteswar Rao

  • Green Hunt: Fact finding Report

    FFR Green Hunt copy1

  • Govt at war with Maoists to aid MNCs: Arundhati

    Arundhati roy 2

  • Stop Green Hunt

    Let us deman copy

  • Interview: Ganapathi

  • Statement against Military offencive

  • Singur to Lalgarh via Nandigram

    Singur to Lalgarh via Nandigram 3

  • Confronting Guns of Peace: Bastar Faces its Worst Crisis

  • Lalgarh: A hopeful spark

    Revolut copy

  • Maoist Images


    Gaddhar in a pro CPI Maoist Rally


  • Lalgarh Images

  • People’s Truth

  • Advertisements

‘Biggest land grab after Columbus’

Posted by Admin on November 14, 2009

A recent report blames the govt and firms such as Tata, Essar for a corporate takeover in the hinterland

Neelesh Misra

Bedanji, Chhattisgarh: In the remote rural expanse that could soon be gobbled up by a Rs19,500 crore steel plant, there is iron in the resolve of protesters.

“We will not give our land to Tata,” says 60-year-old Sankar Das, a frail dhoti-clad Hindu priest, even as he pokes round in a cloth bag during a meeting of village elders. Das produces a letter written by residents of his village, Bedanji, to the district administrator of Jagdalpur in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar region, home to some of the world’s richest iron ore.

My land, my way: Villagers show a letter written to a government official that says they would not sell their land in Chitrakoot, Jagdalpur. Satish Bhate / Hindustan Times

My land, my way: Villagers show a letter written to a government official that says they would not sell their land in Chitrakoot, Jagdalpur. Satish Bhate / Hindustan Times

Tata Steel Ltd, the country’s largest private sector steel maker, plans to invest Rs19,500 crore in a steel plant across 5,000 acres that will create 5.5 million tonnes of steel per year. Ten villages have to be emptied out to accommodate the factory.

“The Kakatiya kings brought and settled us here from Warangal 22 generations ago to worship the goddess and supervise sacrifices on Dussehra,” says the letter handwritten by Bedanji residents in Hindi.

“We shall not move.”

The Kakatiyas were medieval kings who ruled what is now Andhra Pradesh. But this is the enduring saga of modern India—farmers refusing to give their land to big businesses riding the wave of a booming economy, looking to feed the unending hunger of an infrastructure-hungry nation.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acknowledged the crisis last week.

“There has been a systematic failure in giving tribals a stake in the modern economic system…the alienation built over decades is taking a dangerous toll,” he said. “The systemic exploitation of our tribal communities…can no longer be tolerated.”

This is not a faraway story: these lands help produce the steel that built your apartment complex.

And it seems no coincidence that India’s mining heartland is also the Maoist heartland. The Maoists are gaining support due to the decades-old angst over mining, forest rights and land acquisition. And they are spreading their influence, through subtle and drastic measures.

In June, a small group of Maoists walked up to the weekly market in Lohandiguda village 340km south of Raipur, and at close range shot dead Vimal Meshram, 42, an influential tribal leader and a very vocal supporter of the Tata project. Then, in full public view, they walked away.

“I think the biggest indictment of the mining sector is that it is only about rich lands and very poor people. Naxalites use mining to extort wealth, like politicians,” said Sunita Narain, head of the Centre of Science and Environment. “If you map the forest wealth, the mineral and the poverty of India, it’s a complete match.”

Tribal people make up only 9% of the country’s population, but over 40% of the land used to build development projects was theirs, according to government estimates.

A just-released government report blames the government and companies such as Tata and Essar for a corporate takeover in the hinterland of Chhattisgarh, warning of “the biggest grab of tribal lands after Columbus”.

“This open declared war will go down as the biggest land grab ever, if it plays out as per the script,” said the report, commissioned by the rural development ministry, chaired by the then-minister Raghuvansh Prasad Singh.

“The drama (is) being scripted by Tata Steel and Essar Steel who wanted seven villages or thereabouts, each to mine the richest lode of iron ore available in India,” it added.

Both companies dismissed the allegation.

“This is ridiculous…there is a formal memorandum of understanding, the land was allocated, the whole process was done in a legal manner. There is no land grab,” Tata Steel spokesman Sanjay Chowdhary told the Hindustan Times.

“It is completely incorrect and baseless,” an unnamed Essar spokesman said in a statement to HT. “Biased and one-sided…reports like this only contribute towards vitiating the atmosphere, which is only suitable to anti-social, anti-development and anti-peace forces.”

Still, tribal communities in India’s mining hubs have no stake in the wealth beneath their feet.

An October public hearing was done as required under the law by the collector or administrator of Jagdalpur, the district where Lohandiguda is located, to seek villagers’ consent to the Tata project.

It was held in a small hall fit for 300 people in the collector’s office, up to 30km away from the villages concerned, citing the Naxalite threat. Entry was restricted on roads from the villages to the office. Several in the gathering were accused by villagers of being government employees pretending to be village farmers.

Approval for the project was unanimous, said district collector Manohar Singh Paraste. Many farmers have agreed to sell, the government says. Compensation cheques have been given away to a lot of people, but numerous complaints have also poured in, saying land was fraudulently bought and the money given to unknown people.

Paraste denied any wrongdoing or that any government employees sat as decoy villagers in the public hearing, but saw no need for the public hearing to take place among the public.

“This is how it has been done in the past, and this is how we will do it,” he said.

In Takraguda village, not too far from where Meshram was killed in the market, that is not good enough for Badru Ram Nag, 45, deputy headman of the Takraguda village.

“We don’t want the money. We won’t give the land,” he says. “We have nothing but land. If you take that away, we will die.”


6 Responses to “‘Biggest land grab after Columbus’”

  1. factfinder said

    The article “The biggest land grab after Columbus” by Neelesh Mishra about the land accusation by Tata Steel is based on draft report of ‘Committee on Agrarian Relations and Unfinished Task of Land Reform’ which by itself is not providing the complete information about the MOU signed between Tata Steel and Chhattisgarh government.

    According to me Tata Steel is a company which is fully committed to the well being of the communities it operates in, especially the tribal people with whom they are working with. They have a hundred year old history of engagement and sharing of the wealth generated by the enterprise in Jamshedpur.

    Being a frequent visitor of Jamshedpur I have experienced how their community development initiatives have ensured a qualitative improvement in the standard of living of the people of the operational & project areas be it in education, health services, development of sports activities, increase in income, Entrepreneurship development, Women empowerment, Preservation of tribal culture and much more. This is a well known fact and there is evidence of this in over 800 villages they are working in, which the members of the committee have ignored during the survey.

    It is ridiculous to believe the report which accuses Tata Steel as the supporter and the first financier of Salwa Judum, the so called anti-Naxalite movement of the people of the area. It is a well known fact that the first movement against the Naxalites was the ‘Jan Jagran Abhiyan’, started in 1991 by Mahendra Karma. That was mostly led by local traders and businessmen. It later collapsed, and the leaders had to seek police protection to survive. In 2005 it was renamed Salwa Judum (meaning “Purification Hunt” in Gondi language) and it is reported that civilians were armed to supposedly fight the Naxalites in the region. And In mid-2008, the movement’s front liner, Mahender Karma announced that Salwa Judum will soon cease to exist.

  2. factfinder said

    For the displaced families of Kalinganagar (Orissa), Tata Steel has gone beyond the stipulations of R&R poli¬cy to give long-term assurance for better quality of life and this has led to the formation of concept of ‘Tata Steel Parivar’ – Tata Steel’s own R&R programme. Tata Steel is the only company to have imple¬mented such a benevolent initiative for the rehabilitation of the displaced villagers. This unique initiative, apart from ensuring improvement in quality of life, is also giving importance to the cultural and emotional re¬quirements of the displaced tribals. Till date, nearly 900 families have been rehabilitated and their progress is mon¬itored closely. They are going to implement ‘Tata Steel Parivar’ at greenfield projects of Chattisgarh.

  3. jas said

    Don’t get misled by articles like ‘the biggest land grab after columbus’ written by Neelesh Mishra which is based on incomplete and incorrect information. Don’t put a barrier in the path of development. It’s a joint effort of Chattishgarh govt. and Tata Steel to develop this backward, undeveloped and poverty driven region. Strengthen their hands to achieve this noble goal……….

  4. nir said

    It is absolutely incorrect to accuse Tata Steel as a supporter or financer of Salwa Judum. Tata Steel has been given land in that area by Chattishgarh govt. for overall development of the area.

  5. alok said

    For true report follow

  6. satnam said

    Tata Steel is a company whose community development initiatives are well known. Its initiatives for qualitative improvement in the standard of living of the people of the operational & project areas be it in education, health services, development of sports activities, increase in income, Entrepreneurship development, Women empowerment, Preservation of tribal culture etc. are highly appreciable.
    Tata Steel’s project at Chattishgarh is going to act like a miracle tool for the development of the tribal people of the region. For the detail view

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: